Screener
LQDI vs GIGB
iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GIGB costs 0.10% less per year.
- GIGB is significantly larger than LQDI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LQDI is classified as alternative, while GIGB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| LQDI | GIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $70M | $907M |
| Since | 2018 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.56% | 4.70% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.7% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.8% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.36 | 0.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.00% | 4.42% |
| Max drawdown | -28.99% | -22.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LQDI and GIGB
Explore further