Screener
LRGC vs REMG
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF vs Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
- LRGC costs 0.25% less per year.
- LRGC is significantly larger than REMG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LRGC covers north america markets; REMG covers emerging markets.
- LRGC follows a active selection strategy; REMG uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRGC | REMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $95M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.03% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.38% | -14.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRGC and REMG
Explore further