Screener
LRGC vs SMMD
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF vs iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Key differences
- SMMD costs 0.24% less per year.
- LRGC follows a active selection strategy; SMMD uses index tracking.
- SMMD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRGC | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $3.0B |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.3% | +36.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.03% | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -19.38% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRGC and SMMD
Explore further