Screener
LRGF vs GLOF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF vs iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- LRGF costs 0.12% less per year.
- LRGF is significantly larger than GLOF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LRGF follows a index enhanced strategy; GLOF uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRGF | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.3B | $196M |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.13% | 1.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.4% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.8% | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 12.58% |
| Max drawdown | -36.03% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRGF and GLOF
Explore further