Screener
LRNZ vs CWS
TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF vs AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
Key differences
- CWS is significantly larger than LRNZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, LRNZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRNZ | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $155M |
| Since | 2020 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.9% | +1.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.55% | 13.35% |
| Max drawdown | -61.33% | -33.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRNZ and CWS
Explore further