Screener
LRNZ vs HFSP
TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF vs TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF
Key differences
- LRNZ costs 0.56% less per year.
- LRNZ is significantly larger than HFSP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LRNZ is classified as equity, while HFSP is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- LRNZ follows a active selection strategy; HFSP uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRNZ | HFSP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $0.7M |
| Since | 2020 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.9% | -15.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.55% | 21.04% |
| Max drawdown | -61.33% | -33.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRNZ and HFSP
Explore further