Skip to content
Screener

LSAT vs GSIE

LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF

LSAT

LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF

Annual cost

0.99%

Fund size

$61M

GSIE

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$5.8B

Key differences

Both LSAT and GSIE are equity ETFs. LSAT charges 0.99% a year and GSIE 0.25%. The main difference: LSAT follows a active selection strategy; GSIE uses index enhanced.

  • LSAT follows a active selection strategy; GSIE uses index enhanced.
  • LSAT covers North America; GSIE covers global markets excluding the US.
  • GSIE costs 0.74% less per year.
  • GSIE is much larger than LSAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, GSIE has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • GSIE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

LSATGSIE
Annual cost (TER)0.99%0.25%
Fund size (AUM)$61M$5.8B
Since20202015
Dividend yield1.73%2.49%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaglobal ex us
Strategyactive selectionindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+11.6%+19.9%
CAGR 3Y+11.5%+17.4%
CAGR 5Y+6.1%+8.2%
Sharpe 3Y0.580.92
Volatility 1Y12.84%14.62%
Max drawdown-20.48%-34.63%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to LSAT and GSIE