Screener
LSAT vs MFVL
LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF vs Motley Fool Value Factor ETF
Key differences
Both LSAT and MFVL are equity ETFs. LSAT charges 0.99% a year and MFVL 0.50%. The main difference: LSAT follows a active selection strategy; MFVL uses index tracking.
- LSAT follows a active selection strategy; MFVL uses index tracking.
- MFVL costs 0.49% less per year.
- LSAT is much larger than MFVL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- LSAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LSAT | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $61M | $7M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.84% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.48% | -7.03% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.