Screener
LSAT vs SMLF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF vs iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
Both LSAT and SMLF are equity ETFs. LSAT charges 0.99% a year and SMLF 0.15%. The main difference: LSAT follows a active selection strategy; SMLF uses index tracking.
- LSAT follows a active selection strategy; SMLF uses index tracking.
- SMLF costs 0.84% less per year.
- SMLF is much larger than LSAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, SMLF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMLF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LSAT | SMLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $61M | $3.9B |
| Since | 2020 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 1.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.6% | +31.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +19.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | +11.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.84% | 17.65% |
| Max drawdown | -20.48% | -41.89% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.