Screener
LST vs FIGB
Leuthold Select Industries ETF vs Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF
Key differences
- FIGB costs 0.29% less per year.
- FIGB is significantly larger than LST — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LST is classified as equity, while FIGB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- LST follows a active selection strategy; FIGB uses index tracking.
- LST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LST | FIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $150M | $465M |
| Since | 2000 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 4.13% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.8% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.38% | 4.53% |
| Max drawdown | -19.47% | -18.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LST and FIGB
Explore further