Screener
MAGG vs FLIA
Madison Aggregate Bond ETF vs Franklin International Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
Both MAGG and FLIA are fixed income ETFs. MAGG charges 0.36% a year and FLIA 0.25%. The main difference: MAGG follows a active selection strategy; FLIA uses index tracking.
- MAGG follows a active selection strategy; FLIA uses index tracking.
- MAGG covers North America; FLIA covers global markets excluding the US.
- FLIA costs 0.11% less per year.
- FLIA is much larger than MAGG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLIA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGG | FLIA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $68M | $750M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.73% | 2.59% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +2.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.95% | 3.33% |
| Max drawdown | -4.55% | -11.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.