Screener
MAGO vs SKRE
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF
Key differences
- SKRE costs 0.24% less per year.
- SKRE is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAGO is classified as alternative, while SKRE is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; SKRE uses inverse.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | SKRE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $10M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.31% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -43.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 46.69% |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -75.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAGO and SKRE
Explore further