Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MANI vs BINC

Man Active Income ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

MANI

Man Active Income ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$16.9B

Key differences

  • MANI is classified as alternative, while BINC is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
  • MANI covers emerging markets markets; BINC covers north america.
  • MANI follows a long short strategy; BINC uses active selection.

Side-by-side comparison

MANIBINC
Annual cost (TER)0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$16.9B
Since2023
Dividend yield5.60%
Asset classalternativefixed income
Regionemerging marketsnorth america
Strategylong shortactive selection
CAGR 1YN/A+6.3%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y2.29%
Max drawdown-0.73%-2.69%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MANI and BINC