Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MANI vs CWS

Man Active Income ETF vs AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF

MANI

Man Active Income ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

CWS

AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF

AdvisorShares

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$155M

Key differences

  • MANI is classified as alternative, while CWS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • MANI covers emerging markets markets; CWS covers north america.
  • MANI follows a long short strategy; CWS uses active selection.

Side-by-side comparison

MANICWS
Annual cost (TER)0.65%
Fund size (AUM)$155M
Since2016
Dividend yield0.31%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionemerging marketsnorth america
Strategylong shortactive selection
CAGR 1YN/A-0.0%
CAGR 3YN/A+10.3%
CAGR 5YN/A+7.9%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.52
Volatility 1Y13.34%
Max drawdown-0.73%-33.82%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MANI and CWS