Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MANI vs KAT

Man Active Income ETF vs Scharf ETF

MANI

Man Active Income ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

KAT

Scharf ETF

Scharf Investments

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$688M

Key differences

  • MANI is classified as alternative, while KAT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • MANI follows a long short strategy; KAT uses active selection.

Side-by-side comparison

MANIKAT
Annual cost (TER)0.75%
Fund size (AUM)$688M
Since2011
Dividend yield0.39%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionemerging markets
Strategylong shortactive selection
CAGR 1YN/AN/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y
Max drawdown-0.73%-9.25%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MANI and KAT