Screener
MANI vs MATE
Man Active Income ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
- MANI follows a long short strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| MANI | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $37M |
| Since | — | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | long short | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -0.73% | -13.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MANI and MATE
Explore further