Screener
MAPP vs EMES
Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF vs Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF
Key differences
- EMES costs 0.15% less per year.
- MAPP is classified as mixed asset, while EMES is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- MAPP follows a active selection strategy; EMES uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAPP | EMES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $11M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.83% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.97% | 20.51% |
| Max drawdown | -12.92% | -12.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAPP and EMES
Explore further