Skip to content
Screener

MARM vs FAPR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - March vs FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April

MARM

FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - March

Annual cost

0.85%

Fund size

$107M

FAPR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April

Annual cost

0.85%

Fund size

$1.1B

Key differences

Both MARM and FAPR are alternative ETFs. MARM charges 0.85% a year and FAPR 0.85%. The main difference: FAPR is much larger than MARM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

  • FAPR is much larger than MARM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

MARMFAPR
Annual cost (TER)0.85%0.85%
Fund size (AUM)$107M$1.1B
Since20242021
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategystructured outcomestructured outcome
CAGR 1Y+7.0%+11.3%
CAGR 3YN/A+13.2%
CAGR 5YN/A+8.8%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.05
Volatility 1Y1.62%4.19%
Max drawdown-2.74%-15.96%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to MARM and FAPR