Screener
MARS vs METV
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF vs Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
Key differences
- METV costs 0.16% less per year.
- METV is significantly larger than MARS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MARS follows a active selection strategy; METV uses index tracking.
- METV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MARS | METV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $232M |
| Since | 2026 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 23.94% |
| Max drawdown | -13.96% | -59.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MARS and METV
Explore further