Screener
MARS vs QDTE
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF vs Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
Key differences
- MARS costs 0.21% less per year.
- QDTE is significantly larger than MARS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MARS is classified as equity, while QDTE is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MARS follows a active selection strategy; QDTE uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| MARS | QDTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.96% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $828M |
| Since | 2026 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 45.82% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +42.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.95% |
| Max drawdown | -13.96% | -22.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MARS and QDTE
Explore further