Skip to content
Screener

MATE vs AOR

Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

MATE

Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF

Annual cost

0.97%

Fund size

$39M

AOR

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.6B

Key differences

MATE is an alternative ETF, while AOR is a mixed asset ETF. MATE charges 0.97% a year and AOR 0.15%.

  • MATE is an alternative fund, while AOR is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; AOR uses active selection.
  • AOR costs 0.82% less per year.
  • AOR is much larger than MATE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MATEAOR
Annual cost (TER)0.97%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$39M$3.6B
Since20252008
Dividend yield2.47%
Asset classalternativemixed asset
Regionemerging markets
Strategytactical allocationactive selection
CAGR 1YN/A+17.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+14.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.9%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.08
Volatility 1Y8.85%
Max drawdown-13.24%-22.95%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to MATE and AOR