Screener
MATE vs ENHI
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
Both MATE and ENHI are alternative ETFs. MATE charges 0.97% a year and ENHI 0.27%. The main difference: MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; ENHI uses active selection.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; ENHI uses active selection.
- MATE covers emerging markets; ENHI covers global markets excluding the US.
- ENHI costs 0.70% less per year.
- MATE is much larger than ENHI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $12M |
| Since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | global ex us |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -5.65% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.