Screener
MATE vs GKAT
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- GKAT costs 0.38% less per year.
- GKAT is significantly larger than MATE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MATE is classified as alternative, while GKAT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; GKAT uses active selection.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | GKAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $158M |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.46% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -10.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MATE and GKAT
Explore further