Screener
MATE vs ISBG
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF
Key differences
Both MATE and ISBG are alternative ETFs. MATE charges 0.97% a year and ISBG 1.14%. The main difference: MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; ISBG uses active selection.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; ISBG uses active selection.
- MATE covers emerging markets; ISBG covers North America.
- MATE costs 0.17% less per year.
- MATE is much larger than ISBG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | ISBG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 1.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $5M |
| Since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -51.76% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.