Screener
MATE vs SAMT
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- SAMT costs 0.31% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than MATE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $619M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.62% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +46.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.65% |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -20.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MATE and SAMT
Explore further