Screener
MAVF vs PY
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Principal Value ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.60% less per year.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAVF | PY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $91M | $212M |
| Since | 1996 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.0% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.06% | 10.74% |
| Max drawdown | -14.87% | -45.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAVF and PY
Explore further