Screener
MAVF vs TACU
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF
Key differences
- TACU costs 0.75% less per year.
- MAVF is significantly larger than TACU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAVF follows a active selection strategy; TACU uses index tracking.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAVF | TACU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $91M | $14M |
| Since | 1996 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.03% | — |
| Max drawdown | -14.87% | -8.91% |
Similar to MAVF and TACU
Explore further