Screener
MBCC vs CGBL
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF vs Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Key differences
- CGBL costs 0.81% less per year.
- CGBL is significantly larger than MBCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MBCC is classified as equity, while CGBL is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- MBCC follows a index tracking strategy; CGBL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MBCC | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.14% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $170M | $6.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 1.92% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.8% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.14% | 9.65% |
| Max drawdown | -30.62% | -11.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MBCC and CGBL
Explore further