Screener
MCH vs JPAN
Matthews China Active ETF vs Matthews Japan Active ETF
Key differences
- MCH covers emerging markets markets; JPAN covers asia pacific.
- MCH follows a active selection strategy; JPAN uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MCH | JPAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $8M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 4.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +32.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.91% | 19.88% |
| Max drawdown | -40.53% | -15.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MCH and JPAN
Explore further