Screener
MCH vs MEM
Matthews China Active ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, MEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MCH | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $53M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 3.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +52.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.2% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.91% | 20.59% |
| Max drawdown | -40.53% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MCH and MEM
Explore further