Screener
MEDI vs OSEA
Harbor Health Care ETF vs Harbor International Compounders ETF
Key differences
- OSEA costs 0.25% less per year.
- OSEA is significantly larger than MEDI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MEDI covers north america markets; OSEA covers global.
- MEDI follows a active selection strategy; OSEA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MEDI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEDI | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $497M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.25% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.2% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.6% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.80% | 15.18% |
| Max drawdown | -19.24% | -18.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEDI and OSEA
Explore further