Screener
MEM vs MCH
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF vs Matthews China Active ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, MEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEM | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $53M | $22M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.06% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.4% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +11.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.59% | 19.91% |
| Max drawdown | -19.10% | -40.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEM and MCH
Explore further