Screener
MEMA vs EEMS
Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- EEMS costs 0.13% less per year.
- EEMS is significantly larger than MEMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MEMA is classified as alternative, while EEMS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- MEMA follows a long short strategy; EEMS uses index tracking.
- EEMS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEMA | EEMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $452M |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.72% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.93% |
| Max drawdown | -13.12% | -48.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEMA and EEMS
Explore further