Screener
MEMA vs XCNY
Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.66% less per year.
- MEMA is classified as alternative, while XCNY is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- MEMA follows a long short strategy; XCNY uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEMA | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $9M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.41% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.39% |
| Max drawdown | -13.12% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEMA and XCNY
Explore further