Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEMX vs BBEM

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF vs JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$50M

BBEM

JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$853M

Key differences

Both MEMX and BBEM are equity ETFs. MEMX charges 0.79% a year and BBEM 0.15%. The main difference: MEMX follows a active selection strategy; BBEM uses index tracking.

  • MEMX follows a active selection strategy; BBEM uses index tracking.
  • BBEM costs 0.64% less per year.
  • BBEM is much larger than MEMX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

MEMXBBEM
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$50M$853M
Since20232023
Dividend yield1.55%2.72%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+56.3%+40.3%
CAGR 3Y+24.5%+20.3%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.120.92
Volatility 1Y22.75%20.57%
Max drawdown-19.27%-17.42%

Similar to MEMX and BBEM