Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEMX vs EMM

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$50M

EMM

Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

Annual cost

0.66%

Fund size

$63M

Key differences

Both MEMX and EMM are equity ETFs. MEMX charges 0.79% a year and EMM 0.66%. The main difference: EMM costs 0.13% less per year.

  • EMM costs 0.13% less per year.
  • Over the last three years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • EMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MEMXEMM
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.66%
Fund size (AUM)$50M$63M
Since20232010
Dividend yield1.55%0.69%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+56.3%+50.1%
CAGR 3Y+24.5%+21.1%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.120.91
Volatility 1Y22.75%22.81%
Max drawdown-19.27%-21.99%

Similar to MEMX and EMM