Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEMX vs VEXC

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF vs Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$45M

VEXC

Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF

Vanguard

Annual cost

0.07%

Fund size

$217M

Key differences

  • VEXC costs 0.72% less per year.
  • VEXC is significantly larger than MEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • MEMX follows a active selection strategy; VEXC uses index tracking.

Side-by-side comparison

MEMXVEXC
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.07%
Fund size (AUM)$45M$217M
Since20232025
Dividend yield1.72%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+62.2%N/A
CAGR 3Y+25.6%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.20N/A
Volatility 1Y21.07%
Max drawdown-19.27%-12.42%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MEMX and VEXC