Screener
METD vs HIBL
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF vs Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- HIBL is significantly larger than METD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- METD follows a inverse strategy; HIBL uses leveraged.
- HIBL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| METD | HIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.02% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $83M |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.63% | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.3% | +242.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +60.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 35.03% | 66.14% |
| Max drawdown | -46.03% | -88.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METD and HIBL
Explore further