Screener
METL vs AGMI
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF vs Themes Silver Miners ETF
Key differences
- AGMI costs 0.64% less per year.
- METL is significantly larger than AGMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- METL follows a active selection strategy; AGMI uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| METL | AGMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $13M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +124.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 48.66% |
| Max drawdown | -27.39% | -33.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METL and AGMI
Explore further