Screener
METV vs FDRS
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.10% less per year.
- METV is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- METV is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- METV follows a index tracking strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
Side-by-side comparison
| METV | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $232M | $77M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.94% | — |
| Max drawdown | -59.64% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METV and FDRS
Explore further