Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

METW vs QDTE

Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF vs Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

METW

Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF

Roundhill Investments

Annual cost

1.00%

Fund size

$27M

QDTE

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

Roundhill Investments

Annual cost

0.96%

Fund size

$828M

Key differences

  • QDTE is significantly larger than METW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • METW follows a multi strategy strategy; QDTE uses option income.

Side-by-side comparison

METWQDTE
Annual cost (TER)1.00%0.96%
Fund size (AUM)$27M$828M
Since20252024
Dividend yield45.82%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategymulti strategyoption income
CAGR 1YN/A+42.8%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y14.95%
Max drawdown-40.52%-22.86%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to METW and QDTE