Screener
MFIG vs AFSM
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
Key differences
Both MFIG and AFSM are equity ETFs. MFIG charges 0.50% a year and AFSM 0.75%. The main difference: MFIG follows a index tracking strategy; AFSM uses active selection.
- MFIG follows a index tracking strategy; AFSM uses active selection.
- MFIG costs 0.25% less per year.
- AFSM is much larger than MFIG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AFSM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFIG | AFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $98M |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.47% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +33.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.39% |
| Max drawdown | -14.29% | -43.54% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.