Screener
MFIG vs DYNF
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
Both MFIG and DYNF are equity ETFs. MFIG charges 0.50% a year and DYNF 0.26%. The main difference: MFIG follows a index tracking strategy; DYNF uses active selection.
- MFIG follows a index tracking strategy; DYNF uses active selection.
- DYNF costs 0.24% less per year.
- DYNF is much larger than MFIG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- DYNF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFIG | DYNF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $36.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.01% |
| Max drawdown | -14.29% | -34.72% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.