Screener
MFIG vs STXV
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF vs Strive 1000 Value ETF
Key differences
- STXV costs 0.32% less per year.
- STXV is significantly larger than MFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFIG | STXV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $78M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.24% |
| Max drawdown | -14.29% | -14.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFIG and STXV
Explore further