Screener
MFIG vs TMFM
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF vs Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- MFIG costs 0.35% less per year.
- TMFM is significantly larger than MFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MFIG follows a index tracking strategy; TMFM uses active selection.
- TMFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFIG | TMFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $117M |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -19.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.99% |
| Max drawdown | -14.29% | -31.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFIG and TMFM
Explore further