Screener
MFLX vs HIMU
First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF vs iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF
Key differences
Both MFLX and HIMU are fixed income ETFs. MFLX charges 0.75% a year and HIMU 0.39%. The main difference: HIMU costs 0.36% less per year.
- HIMU costs 0.36% less per year.
- HIMU is much larger than MFLX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- HIMU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFLX | HIMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2016 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 4.09% | 5.14% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.2% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.07% | 4.45% |
| Max drawdown | -26.76% | -8.01% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.