Screener
MFSG vs CGGG
MFS Active Growth ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGGG costs 0.10% less per year.
- MFSG is significantly larger than CGGG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MFSG follows a active selection strategy; CGGG uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFSG | CGGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $293M | $78M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.08% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.13% | — |
| Max drawdown | -23.24% | -17.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFSG and CGGG
Explore further