Screener
MFSV vs CGVV
MFS Active Value ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF
Key differences
- CGVV costs 0.11% less per year.
- MFSV is significantly larger than CGVV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MFSV follows a active selection strategy; CGVV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFSV | CGVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $443M | $128M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.34% | — |
| Max drawdown | -12.74% | -10.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFSV and CGVV
Explore further