Screener
MFSV vs FNDA
MFS Active Value ETF vs Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Key differences
- FNDA costs 0.19% less per year.
- FNDA is significantly larger than MFSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MFSV follows a active selection strategy; FNDA uses index tracking.
- FNDA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFSV | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $443M | $10.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.34% | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -12.74% | -44.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFSV and FNDA
Explore further