Screener
MFSV vs FVAL
MFS Active Value ETF vs Fidelity Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- FVAL costs 0.29% less per year.
- MFSV follows a active selection strategy; FVAL uses index tracking.
- FVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFSV | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $443M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.34% | 11.74% |
| Max drawdown | -12.74% | -37.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFSV and FVAL
Explore further